Prev: RE: Re: Fighters Next: RE: Re: Fighters

RE: Fighters

From: "Alfie Finch" <alfie.finch@b...>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 00:59:33 +0100
Subject: RE: Fighters

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> [mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf
> Of Ray Forsythe
> Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 11:21 PM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: Fighters
>
>
> Alfie Finch wrote:
>
> > We experimented with allowing ADFC controlled
> defences engage
> > any enemy fighter group whether they were attacking
> friendlies
> > or not, and also allowing ADFC controlled defences
> to engage at
> > 9 MU (not both rule changes simultaneously though). This
> > generally led to wholesale slaughter of the
> fighters against any
> > fleet fielding ADFC systems until players got used
> to holding
> > their fighters off at considerable range until they
> were ready
> > to commit in a large group.
> >
> > It also wouldn't solve the FB1 ships issue with no ADFC NAC
> > vessels and mostly ADFC systems only apearing as
> known variants.
> >
>
> The NAC Furious class escort cruiser seems to have an ADFC.
>
>
I meant FSE...NAC has Minerva/A and Tacoma/A variants with ADFC


Prev: RE: Re: Fighters Next: RE: Re: Fighters