Prev: Back on the list. Next: Re: [OT] Trek once more

Re: Another tack on fighters

From: Kevin Walker <sage@c...>
Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 12:54:45 -0500
Subject: Re: Another tack on fighters


On Sunday, May 5, 2002, at 12:41 AM, Donald Hosford wrote:

> So what it seems to total up to:
>
> FB vs FB -- Seems to be ok.

Even in FB vs. FB (or a number of other design situations) it's more the

number of fighters that decides whether they're not balanced.  OMMV, but

what I've witnessed is when the number of fighters differs greatly from 
the number of PDs.  If larger point values this becomes even more 
problematic as the fighters can dogpile on one of few targets and 
sometimes succeed in avoiding some of the PDs in the fleet because they 
don't have ADFC tied with some or they are out of range of use.  Thus 
specifically with FB designs if one side brings all carriers and the 
other side may be in for a stiff battle.

Kevin Walker


Prev: Back on the list. Next: Re: [OT] Trek once more