Prev: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity Next: Re: AMERICA, RIGHT OR WRONG?

Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity

From: "Brian Bilderback" <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 14:02:16 -0700
Subject: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity

>From: Roger Books <books@jumpspace.net>

> > Not a bad thing if that's how you want them in the game setting you
run.
> > :-)
>
>That brings up another common discussion.
>
>1. Fighters are too powerful (usually those that don't use morale)
>
>2. Fighters are close to correct in value.
>
>(The phrasing shows my bias)
>
>I don't think I've heard anyone say fighters in large numbers,
>4+ squadrons, are too weak.

You're probably right.	I'm not suggesting it be a standard rule, but
rather 
an option available if it fits into the view of fighters appropriate for
the 
setting.  Mind you, I'm still waiting for my first chance to play the
game, 
I was just wondering if this was an option anyone had explored.

3B^2

_________________________________________________________________


Prev: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity Next: Re: AMERICA, RIGHT OR WRONG?