Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity
From: Roger Books <books@j...>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 16:40:03 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity
On 30-Apr-02 at 15:56, Brian Bilderback (bbilderback@hotmail.com) wrote:
> Roger Books wrote:
> >This is another "discussed to death" topic.
>
> Sorry if I'm rehashing an old subject, but this was probably beofre I
was
> into FT. Just asking.
Nothing to be sorry about. My intention was to let you know there
was much discussion in the archives, not to chastise anyone.
> >The consensus, as far as I remember, was that it made
> >fighters much cheaper and therefore much stronger.
>
> Not a bad thing if that's how you want them in the game setting you
run.
> :-)
That brings up another common discussion.
1. Fighters are too powerful (usually those that don't use morale)
2. Fighters are close to correct in value.
(The phrasing shows my bias)
I don't think I've heard anyone say fighters in large numbers,
4+ squadrons, are too weak.