[FT] Beanstalks again was Fwd: And Another Thing ...
From: "Brian Bilderback" <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 14:36:06 -0800
Subject: [FT] Beanstalks again was Fwd: And Another Thing ...
My friend Brian and I had a chat about the recent Beanstalk discussion.
He
suggested the following:
>From: "Brian Fuchs" To: "Brian Bilderback" <BBilderback@Hotmail.com>
>Subject: And Another Thing ...
> If you placed multiple beanstalks around the equator of your planet
>(for example: 240 around earth's equator, each 100 miles apart), it
would
>become more economical to give up on the idea of geosynchronous
satellites
>altogether. Instead, a "ring" would be formed around the planet by
>building an arching Causeway between the cables, which then become like
the
>spokes in a wagon wheel.
>
> The earth is the hub, and the Causeway occupies every point along
the
>circle described by geosynchronous altitude above the equator of the
>planet. The Causeway could then be filled with such instrumentation as
is
>deemed most useful to have been a geosynchronous orbit. Structural
>stresses on the Causeway itself would be minimal, as it is both
weightless
>and steady at each end by a cable.
>
> Perhaps farther out, another ring could be attached at the extreme
>high end of the cables. This one would, of course, have to be much
more
>structurally resilient. But it would provide a working and perhaps
living
>space with gravity. Here we could station of those workers responsible
for
>launching interplanetary vehicles.
_________________________________________________________________