RE: Re: FMA Battalion
From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:57:13 -0800 (PST)
Subject: RE: Re: FMA Battalion
--- "laserlight@quixnet.net" <laserlight@quixnet.net>
wrote:
>
> From: Mike.Elliott@integris.co.uk
>
> >Some interesting ideas there..... but I would make
> flank attacks more
> effective than just 1 downshift. If you think about
> it, it's a lot easier
> for a unit to simply about face and engage an enemy
> to the rear, than it is
> to wheel the whole unit through 90 degrees to face
> an attack from the
> flank.
>
> True but I'm under the impression that an attack
> from the rear is more disheartening? In any event,
> a flank attack is probably only going to have to
> deal with one units at a time and will roll up the
> line that way. Haven't tested it yet, we'll see.
It also depends on the size of the unit being hit in
the rear. A platoon attacked from the rear can turn
around. A batallion attacked from the rear has a
bunch of support units strung out behind it, and those
going to be shot up pretty badly before the
batallion's combat elements can move backwards to
protect them.
John
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!