Re: [OT] WWII rules?
From: jmodule@y...
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 14:10:57 -0500
Subject: Re: [OT] WWII rules?
It appears my message came through blank... I'm not sure why.
Anyway, I was going to suggest Mike Elliott's conversion at:
http://www.felixent.f9.co.uk/games/art96.html
It may be the same as what Andy suggested.
Also there's a big list of WW2 rules at:
http://freespace.virgin.net/pete.jones/Rules/World_War_2/world_war
_2.htm
- Jakim
On 5 Dec 2001, at 12:55, Andy Cowell wrote:
> In message <20011205182757.48444.qmail@web10806.mail.yahoo.com>, Jakim
Friant w
> rites:
> > -- Roger Books wrote:
> > >
> > > Anyone have suggestions for WWII armour (1/300)
> > > rules? We like the alternating move style of DS,
> > but
> > > nobody in my gaming group is experienced or
> > > knowledgable enough to convert historical WWII units
> > > to DS units.
>
> I'd suggest Piquet's Point of Attack: Blitzkrieg. It shares a lot in
> common with FMA, IMO. It also has a lot of things going for it like
> three different gaming scales (unit == squad, platoon and battalion)
> in the same game. I enjoy it a lot.
>
> http://www.piquet.com/
>
> I do believe, however, that there are at least two different
straight-up
> conversions of DS2 to WWII. One by Mike Elliot, and the other not
(sorry,
> I forgot the name). For an early version of Mike's rules, see
> http://www.cowell.org/~andy/min/ds2/variants/ww2.html. I think I came
> across the other set on MagWeb. Ah yes, by Dave Hornung in Courier
#80.
> http://www.magweb.com/premium/courier/80/tc80dirt.htm but you'll need
> a subscription. (*WELL* worth it. I love MagWeb.)
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?