Re: Manouverability of AIFVs

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Glenn M Wilson" <triphibious@juno.com>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: Manouverability of AIFVs

> On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:06:51 -0500 "Tomb" <kaladorn@fox.nstn.ca>
writes:
> <snip>
> >Now, if you're building a self sustaining, self deploying
peacekeeping
> >force that needs to be fairly mine-aware, the LAV-III makes good 
> >sense.
> >If you're building a warfighting force where air mobility, rapid
> >deployment, survivability (ie low profile) vs. conventional weapons, 
> >and
> >ability to be refitted with good armour is key, then it seems (at 
> >least
> >from the review I read) to not be a terribly good option. And it
> >definitely seemed to lose in the "cross bad terrain" or "turn on a 
> >dime"
> >categories....
> >
> >Am I missing something? 
> >
> >Tomb. 
> >
> >
> Marines don't buy Army.

Or Army doesn't sell to Marines. It depends upon who you ask.


> Gracias,
> Glenn/Triphibious@juno.com
> This is my Science Fiction Alter Ego E-mail address.
> Historical - Warbeads@juno.com
> Fantasy and 6mm - dwarf_warrior@juno.com
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
> GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
> Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
> Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit: