Prev: Re: OK OK I Give! (Was Powers)) Next: Re: Ghurkas

Re: OK OK I Give! (Was Powers))

From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 21:33:34 EST
Subject: Re: OK OK I Give! (Was Powers))

(Warning - role playing on:) "So, after [509 years (plus the GZG story
line) additional years]  of oppression, we are to get a true homeland
but
be allowed only non-FTL "Home Defense" ships?  No Department of Defense
ever won a war.  The NPC needs FTL ships to preemptively strike threats
before they threaten our 'defenseless ones' in our homes!'  

Statement attributed to one NPC negotiator during the planning of the
NPC
colony...

BTW, I am in a training class tomorrow (was today) and have a function
at
church tonight but I will try and get the history of the NPC on the list
this week.  Two points:

1)Initially these were nations sketched out for a Starguard campaign -
hence there is some cleaning up of time line anomalies and other points.

2)I am very much DS2 oriented.	I expect the FT groups I will run in one
off games will be non-Canon GZG Aliens (Nektons, Whistlers, Mertuns, and
Klackons) and NSL or ESU Canon space forces.  Hence the FT/DS2 interface
will be a while.

Gracias,
Glenn/Triphibious@juno.com
This is my Science Fiction Alter Ego E-mail address.
Historical - Warbeads@juno.com
Fantasy and 6mm - dwarf_warrior@juno.com

On Tue, 06 Nov 2001 15:15:30 -0800 "Brian Bilderback"
<bbilderback@hotmail.com> writes:
>Given.  However, my main concern is with justifying any considerable 
>FTL 
>capability.  It seems unnecessary with only 1 planet.
>
>Brian
>
>"The Irish are the only race of people on Earth for which 
>psychoanalysis is 
>of no use."
>
>				  - S. Freud
>
>
>>From: Beth.Fulton@csiro.au
>>Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
>>To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
>>Subject: RE: CNP and TTN (Was Hmmm.... Was Re: OK OK I Give! (Was 
>Powers))
>>Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 10:10:39 +1100
>>
>>G'day,
>>
>> >I'd like to have at least a couple of worlds,
>> >for playability (gives me more places to stage
>> >battles and therefore games).  The way the NAC helped
>>them get started makes it a bit more plausible.
>> >It would also cut down on inter-tribal tension,
>> >since they'd be able to place tribes with
>> >EXTREMELY volatile histories on different worlds.
>>
>>While these are all sound reasons don't forget we're talking planets 
>here!
>>There's an AWFUL lot of room even on small ones and I'd say an awful 
>lot of
>>habitats despite Hollywoods obcession with "its all desert/water/lush
>>jungle" visions. As far as anyone can tell, anything with a working 
>biome
>>that will support human habitation is going to end up with many 
>different
>>environments. So even one planet will provide many locations for a 
>battle
>>and a lot of settlement space - look how many habitats and different
>>cultures there are on this planet ;)
>>
>>Cheers
>>
>>Beth
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at 
>http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>

________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.


Prev: Re: OK OK I Give! (Was Powers)) Next: Re: Ghurkas