RE: Thanks for Rules Answers
From: "Hudak, Michael" <mihudak@s...>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 10:44:55 -0400
Subject: RE: Thanks for Rules Answers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris DeBoe [mailto:LASERLIGHT@QUIXNET.NET]
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:32 AM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: Thanks for Rules Answers
>
>
> Mike "More Efficient That Way" Hudak:
>
> > Hey Stuart, can I run a flame thrower unit this year? ;-)
>
> why do you need a flamer? You already showed that you can get the same
> effect with an IAVR exhaust.
>
Sematics mostly. Just the difference between direct effect and indirect