Re: ADFC, Vector, SMs and Fighters...

Ryan said:
> However, certain elements have begun to argue that ADFC should also
> be reduced to 3" under this rule. This flies in the face of the
> reasoning for the original reduction of attack range.

You reduce the missile (and fighter, if you like) attack radius in
Vector because the ship's destination is much more predictable than in
Cinematic.  If you had 6" attack radius, you could not miss any ship
that was thrust 6 or less.   But this has nothing to do with ADFC.