Prev: RE: [SG] Ship building Next: RE: [OT]Ok chance to be web critics again!

Re: FT-Movement, corkscrewing

From: "Izenberg, Noam" <Noam.Izenberg@j...>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 08:34:05 -0400
Subject: Re: FT-Movement, corkscrewing

From: Charles Taylor <charles.taylor@cableol.co.uk>

> One further point, I'd specify that the thrust required for a
corkscrew
> _must_ count as manoeuvre thrust, which would:
> a) limit the manoeuvre to ships with at least Main Drive 6 (or
Advanced
> Drive 3), which would effectively prevent most large ships from using
it
>...b) The likelihood of a ship being able to both corkscrew _and_ turn
is
> very low, so the 'damage if ship turns and corkscrews' rule could
>probably be dropped.

I kind of like this idea, but...
Looking at FB1, the total number of ships that could use the roll to any
benefit with this restriction are:
ESU: None
FSE: San Miguel, Suffren, Milan, Jerez,Ypres (1XC2 on each)
NSL: None
NAC: Tacoma, Ticonderoga, Huron, Vandenburg (1XC2 on each)

So it becomes useful for pretty much custom ships only.

I'd rather make the cost 4 Thrust and say ships can't turn  while
corckscrewing.

Prev: RE: [SG] Ship building Next: RE: [OT]Ok chance to be web critics again!