Prev: Re: [DS} a few of questions Next: ISO UN ship SSDs

RE: [DS} a few of questions

From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 23:28:07 -0400
Subject: RE: [DS} a few of questions

At 11:43 PM -0400 7/14/01, Brian Bell wrote:
>1) Not covered in the rules AFAIK. Propose a house rule. I would 
>call it hard landing from Low Mode. From High Mode, I would suggest 
>that it crash off board.

Crash...

>2) I don't have the books in front of me at the moment. If GMS 
>attack TOP armor, then the ADS should have a shot at it. If GMS 
>attack front/side/back armor, then it should be blocked.

Huh? Top armour attack missile fly right over the tank in some cases. 
If the missile was at 13" at the minimum, then it was never in 
engagement range. If it was an there was clear line of sight (and 
within 12") to the vehicle targeted by the missile then the missile 
is fair game. If not then the missile is not bothered by the ADS.

>3) I would expect it to stay in cover if it has cover. If it does 
>not have cover, I would expect it to get off the board. If it takes 
>opprotunity fire, it would probably have taken AIMED fire on the 
>next round. So better a chance to escape than no chance.

Whats the difference? I generally think that a unit will only 
surrender when there is a unit fairly close. If it takes fire and is 
at routed it probably just ceases to exist. Either way. The unit is 
gonegonegone.

--
- Ryan Montieth Gill		DoD# 0780 (Smug #1) / AMA / SOHC -
- ryan.gill@SPAMturner.com  I speak not for CNN, nor they for me -
- rmgill@SPAMmindspring.com	     www.mindspring.com/~rmgill/ -


Prev: Re: [DS} a few of questions Next: ISO UN ship SSDs