Prev: Re: Suggested figure posings (for Jon Tuffley) Next: Re: Suggested figure posings (for Jon Tuffley)

Re: David's vehicle design

From: "Andrew Martin" <Al.Bri@x...>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 12:15:10 +1200
Subject: Re: David's vehicle design

Ryan wrote:
> Though the Ontos with 6 105mm RRs would also violate the rule I guess.
I
sometimes break it with some vehicles anyhow I think. Mostly in
augmentations of additional SAWs and MMGs like on the Merkava: a 120mm
main
gun, a 60mm mortar, a Coax MG in 7.62, an  external Coax .50 MG, a TC's
7.62MG and a Loader's 7.62MG, 6 weapons on an ostensibly size 3 or size
4
tank.

In my designs, I assume that modern battle tanks are around size six or
seven. That's because I have M113 at Size 2, Bradley at Size 3 and M60
at
around size 5. For the 120mm gun, I assume it's around size 6. 105 =
Size 5,
90 = size 4, 75 = size 3. For the 140mm gun, I assume it's around size
7.

YMMV.

Andrew Martin
ICQ: 26227169 http://zen.scripterz.org
-><-


Prev: Re: Suggested figure posings (for Jon Tuffley) Next: Re: Suggested figure posings (for Jon Tuffley)