Re: ADFC clarification

Got it!

Thanks to all for the answers.

On Sat, 05 May 2001 18:56:44 -0400 Richard and Emily Bell
<rlbell@sympatico.ca> writes:
>
>
>Glenn M Wilson wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 5 May 2001 12:44 +0100 ateske@hicom.net writes:
>> >
>> >Glenn wrote:
>> >>Does that mean toprotect *two* ships you need *two*  ADFC?  Three 
>to
>> >>protect three?
>> >>
>> >>Suddenly I am a 'mite bewildered' by those words.
>> >
>> >I've been having fun with trying to get a new ISP working, so I 
>missed
>> >what you're replying to, but your statement above is how I've seen
>> >ADFC working the whole time.  Just like a regular firecon, each 
>ADFC
>> >can target only one ship a turn, it's just that this is for 
>defensive
>> >firing instead of offensive.
>> >
>> >			       Aaron
>>
>> And I assume that applies one fighter group or one Sm group too?
>>
>> Glenn/Triphibious
>> This is my Science Fiction Alter Ego E-mail address.
>
>That would make the ADFC too limited, IMHO.  I would think that the 
>ADFC
>allows the vessel to fire at any FTR's, SML's, and PB's that threaten 
>the
>protected vessel.
>

________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.