Prev: Re: ADFC clarification | Next: Re: ADFC clarification |
Glenn M Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, 5 May 2001 12:44 +0100 ateske@hicom.net writes:
> >
> >Glenn wrote:
> >>Does that mean toprotect *two* ships you need *two* ADFC? Three to
> >>protect three?
> >>
> >>Suddenly I am a 'mite bewildered' by those words.
> >
> >I've been having fun with trying to get a new ISP working, so I
missed
> >what you're replying to, but your statement above is how I've seen
> >ADFC working the whole time. Just like a regular firecon, each ADFC
> >can target only one ship a turn, it's just that this is for defensive
> >firing instead of offensive.
> >
> > Aaron
>
> And I assume that applies one fighter group or one Sm group too?
>
> Glenn/Triphibious
> This is my Science Fiction Alter Ego E-mail address.
That would make the ADFC too limited, IMHO. I would think that the ADFC
allows the vessel to fire at any FTR's, SML's, and PB's that threaten
the
protected vessel.
Prev: Re: ADFC clarification | Next: Re: ADFC clarification |