Prev: Re: SG2: Vehicles with turreted infantry weapons Next: Re: Small squads/random losses

Re: [FT] Conquest 2001 FT results

From: "Oerjan Ohlson" <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 21:18:27 +0200
Subject: Re: [FT] Conquest 2001 FT results

Robertson, Brendan wrote:

>The results for the Full Thrust 2001 Conquest tournament (cm scale on
>6'x5' tables) were as follows:

Cinematic or Vector? (...I assume Cinematic, but it's best to make sure
:-/ )

>... the KV vs Phalon was a whitewash.	From a starting v:24, the
Phalons >got up to v:55 

Speed *55*? If it isn't a typo, then even I will be impressed :-)

[snip]

>Unfortunately at this point, the Phalon player cracked it and went
home for
>various reasons.  In previous discussion he had mentioned he'd number
>crunched and playtested with his local group, but both Andrew & I both
>knew how to deal with Phalons.  Against inexperienced players, his
fleet >may have worked.

<sneak peeks at fleet lists> Nothing but *Phuun-class frigates*??
They're nice as escorts for heavier ships, but I'd never dare to send
them out on their own - they die if someone breathes at them... they
could work against an enemy who uses no fighters or missiles (when you
only have 5 damage points per ship you don't really want to use even
PBL-1s as area point defence!) and who keeps all his ships in one nice
tight formation, but that's about it.

Then again, I probably don't qualify as "inexperienced" concerning
Phalons :-/ 

What Kra'Vak fleet did you use, BTW?

Later,

Oerjan Ohlson
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com

"Life is like a sewer.
What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."


Prev: Re: SG2: Vehicles with turreted infantry weapons Next: Re: Small squads/random losses