RE: [SG] Close assault interpretation questions
From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 12:52:44 +0100 (CET)
Subject: RE: [SG] Close assault interpretation questions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Owen Glover wrote:
> er, I'm sorry but the rules state quite plainly that you have to be in
range
> for the combat role.." this movement distance.. MUST be sufficient to
allow
> at least some figures of the assaulting unit to come into
contact....".
> Page 41, third paragraph of INITIATING CLOSE ASSAULT......eg for
regular
> foot max 12", Fast PA max 24", terrain restrictions
notwithstanding....
Oopsie :)
> This is one of those rules discussions just CRYING out for incluson in
a
> FAQ?
Yes.
Cheers,
Derk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine
iD8DBQE6rgoSJXH58oo6ncURArWmAJ9KQV81xC+Eo2PRgIx0SddqyMitGgCglJRY
n9BA24+I+iUcHPpK1Yb+/gE=
=5YF3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----