Re: (OT) What I love to hate was
From: KH.Ranitzsch@t...
Date: 13 Feb 2001 10:32 GMT
Subject: Re: (OT) What I love to hate was
>Absender: derekfulton@bigpond.com
> Casquilho, Daniel wrote:
> >GW is looking to grow and thus they
> >understand that you need to kill off products that are not selling
> >and revamp the ones that might. We as older players may not like
> >the "new editions" but the fact remains that a tree that is pruned
> >grows better.
>
> Dumbed down more like it, I'll be the first to admit that their
> miniatures are good quality but their rules are based back in the
> 60's (borrowed form books with titles like 'Battlegaming' or the
> 'Boys bumper book of wargaming') and are simply there to get you to
> purchase more miniatures (exculsively from Gamesworkshop of course).
Inspired by the title of this thread:
I have seen a lot of people complaining of GW's marketing policies,
dumb rules, expensive figures etc.
But I rarely, if ever have seen anybody complaining about my own pet GW
hate:
The often gory graphic and bloodthirsty rhetoric of their publications.
Warhammer was first advertised with the headline "Let's smash skulls"
and it has gone downhill from there - see their recent Dark Eldar.
Like with other matters, your tastes may vary, but is it just me who
prefers his games in a language that would not make a Nazi
Kriegsberichterstatter blush ?
Greetings