RE: [SG2] [DS2] articulation - a final thought
From: "Owen Glover" <oglover@b...>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 12:44:20 +1000
Subject: RE: [SG2] [DS2] articulation - a final thought
Hi Alan,
Actually i think in most cases you'll find a reasonable fit between
Jon's DS
and SG if you remeber the APSW team. So, for the NSL how about a 4 man
Rifle
Team and a 2 man APSW team (Tom didn't raise these in his discussion but
think these might best cover the PPG aspect in DS)?
Owen G
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> [mailto:owner-gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf Of Allan Goodall
> Sent: Sunday, 15 October 2000 9:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [SG2] [DS2] articulation - a final thought
>
> SNIPPITY SNIP
> That's quite interesting, actually! Especially since it doesn't
> fit with Jon's
> articulation model in the SG2 rules. He lists squads of being
> between 6 and 8.
>
> I wonder, then, how you deal with NSL troops? If the NAC TO&E
> lists squads of
> 8 troops which can be broken into two fireteams of 4, how do you
> break down
> the canon NSL squads of 6 troops? Two of three seems a bit too
> small, but one
> of 6 is a bit big. NSL squads tend to have two support weapons: a SAW
and
> either a plasma gun or a GMS. Split the squad into a fireteam of
> 4 with a SAW
> and a fireteam of 2 with the other support weapon?