RE: UNSC fleet carrier design

On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Charles Stanley Taylor wrote:

> > On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Charles Stanley Taylor wrote:
> > 
> [snip]
> > > 
> > > Well, have you seen the figure! (it is a) big, and b) noticably
modular,
> > > and I have a psychological limitation "must design ships to have
systems
> > > represented by features on the figures" - which is a pain) 
> > 
> > Out of curiosity, how do you work the standard line of GZG figs,
then?
> 
> Err... I'm lazy and use the fleetbooks 

*grin*

> > And you must LOVE the Superior line of Starfleet Wars ships.  :-)
> 
> Hmm.. not sure I've seen them - I'll have a look.

When you look, look underneath!  ;-)

> > > Once the fighters are gone (presume you mean destroyed) it runs
away
> > > (well, tries to) - but point taken (this is a _UN_ ship - probably
> > > designed by committe :-).
> > 
> > Not *my* UN committee!  ;-)
> > 
> > Mk
> >
> Do you have any UN designs, I'd be interested in having a look, I
havn't
> found many (which is why I'm designing my own - see 'lazy' comment
> above!) since starting this project I've found some on Paul Radford's
> website:
> 
> http://www.innotts.co.uk/~paulradford/
> 
> Under his campaign section - they are a bit different, and he's fitted
> some with Railguns (like K-guns, but with a different SSD symbol).

My UNSC designs fitting the new figs are not yet ready for publication
(sorry, Oerjan! :). I've had almost zero time to really devote to
working on this in the past few months.  :-/

> Anyway, this committe of one will continue hacking about with my
> designs, and hopefully I'll get round to trying them out soon :-)

Oh, no discouragement meant from this committee! I enjoy seeing what
other people's ideas are on things.

Mk