Re: Sa'Vasku

> I have been using that same justification for my "expendable" smaller
ships.
> I can't justify the loss rates if they're crewed, but since we tend
towards
> larger capital ships anyway (DNs runn around 350 mass), nobody has any
> problem thinking of them as beam or "scatterpack" missile pods.

That's the general thinking behind my "cloaking submunition bombs" that
wound
up touching off the huge thread on modular ships as well -- they're
AI-driven,
combustible ships that have little purpose but to fly up to someone and
raise
hell.
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 The Stilt Man		      stiltman@teleport.com
   http://www.teleport.com/~stiltman/stiltman.html
   < We are Microsoft Borg '98.  Lower your expectations and	>
   < surrender your money.  Antitrust law is irrelevant.	>
   < Competition is irrelevant.  We will add your financial and >
   < technological distinctiveness to our own.	Your software	>
   < will adapt to service ours.  Resistance is futile. 	>