RE: [FT] Cutter Beam Alternatives
From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <s_schoon@p...>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 11:37:50 -0700
Subject: RE: [FT] Cutter Beam Alternatives
>For limited number of loss-to-threshold, I would suggest making it
simple
>such as Most massive to least massive systems.
This might be different for each ship, but I agree on the idea.
>1. Sensors (FCS, ADFC, Sensors, ECM) & Screens (including Vapor Shroud,
>Cloak, etc).
I'm not sure that sensors would make the #1 slot in most cases.
>2. Engines (FTL, MD)
>3. Bays (Fighter, Missile, Passenger/Cargo, Drone Wombs)
For carriers this would be higher.
>4. Large Weapons (over mass 3) and Power Centers
Power centers? I'm assuming that this is a reference to Sa'Vasku Power
Generators, but as they are a part of the hull, and not normally subject
to
threshold checks, I'd question including them here.
>5. Small Weapons (mass 3 and smaller including PDS)
>6. Core Systems (if threshold level indicates).
Other than that, it works for me.
Schoon