Prev: RE: [FT] Cutter Beam Alternatives Next: Those darned B1's

RE: [FT] Cutter Beam Alternatives

From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <s_schoon@p...>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 11:37:50 -0700
Subject: RE: [FT] Cutter Beam Alternatives

>For limited number of loss-to-threshold, I would suggest making it
simple
>such as Most massive to least massive systems.

This might be different for each ship, but I agree on the idea.

>1. Sensors (FCS, ADFC, Sensors, ECM) & Screens (including Vapor Shroud,
>Cloak, etc).

I'm not sure that sensors would make the #1 slot in most cases.

>2. Engines (FTL, MD)
>3. Bays (Fighter, Missile, Passenger/Cargo, Drone Wombs)

For carriers this would be higher.

>4. Large Weapons (over mass 3) and Power Centers

Power centers? I'm assuming that this is a reference to Sa'Vasku Power
Generators, but as they are a part of the hull, and not normally subject
to
threshold checks, I'd question including them here.

>5. Small Weapons (mass 3 and smaller including PDS)
>6. Core Systems (if threshold level indicates).

Other than that, it works for me.

Schoon

Prev: RE: [FT] Cutter Beam Alternatives Next: Those darned B1's