Prev: Re: Dirtside vs. Stargrunt? Next: Re: B5 and rotating sections

RE: Dirtside vs. Stargrunt?

From: "Bell, Brian K" <Brian_Bell@d...>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 10:57:25 -0400
Subject: RE: Dirtside vs. Stargrunt?

Perhaps basing them as some have done fighters. Use earing post
on/through
the base and the clip on the bottom of the figure?

-----
Brian Bell
bkb@beol.net	 
-----

> -----Original Message-----
> From: A Scruffy Drummer [SMTP:jfriant@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 10:50 AM
> To:	gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> Subject:	Re: Dirtside vs. Stargrunt?
> 
> Brian Quirt <baqrt@mta.ca> wrote:
> >found them to be really good games. I actually play both with the
> >same miniatures (1:300), which also saves money (and table space, at
> 
> >least for SG) (and painting time, which is my LEAST favourite part
> >of miniatures gaming).
> 
> How you base your infantry to do this?  SG infantry are usually based 
> seperately and DS are usually grouped in 3 or 5's.  So if one is going
to 
> use the same little guys for both games what do you do?  I'd think
that 
> using a bunch of individually base guys for DS would end up being very

> fiddly. But on the SG side, it wouldn't look as nice to have your
squad 
> loose three soldiers but still have all eight minis on the board. 
I've
> been 
> thinking about using my 1/300 infantry for both games (and maybe FMA 
> Skirmish!), but they've been sitting unfinished until I figure out how
I 
> want to base them.
> 
> Jakim
> ----------------------------------------------
> http://www.geocities.com/~jmodule
> http://surf.to/sfb
> "It's only paranoia if they aren't after you!"
> -----------------------------------------------
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com


Prev: Re: Dirtside vs. Stargrunt? Next: Re: B5 and rotating sections