Re: The GZG Digest V1 #901
From: "Paul Radford" <paulradford@i...>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 19:17:27 +0100
Subject: Re: The GZG Digest V1 #901
>Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 18:54:28 +0200
>From: "Oerjan Ohlson" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Subject: Re: NAC Fifth Fleet
>Nice page. But who is "John Tuffley"...? <g>
Oh pants! I'll change it at once! Apologies Jon :)
>The ship code "DDG" usually refers to a missile-armed DD rather than to
>a "heavy" one.
Well, yes. This is true for guided missile destroyers today. I decided
change the conventions a little bit for our gaming group so that we
more easily differentiate the three types of destroyer. So DD for
DDG for Super Destroyers and DD/m for missile destroyers. The '/m'
applied to the missile armed version of the NAC CE Furious is it not? I
suppose it could be CG like modern day Aegis cruisers. Hmmm. Answered my
question i think.
>Have you remembered to change the FT Network entry?
Indeed. It was one of the first things i did after uploading the
>>Please don't tell the Narn Bat squad that I did this! :)
>You did it yourself :-/
Victim is prone and truely beaten! :)
"Oh my god! They've summoned Cthulhu! You bastards!