Prev: Re: [FT]: Happiness Is.... Next: Re: [OT] Suggested Sci-Fi [CLEAN STAMP]

Re: Campaign costs

From: Mikko Kurki-Suonio <maxxon@d...>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 09:33:24 +0300 (EEST)
Subject: Re: Campaign costs


Donald writes:

> have an "economic value" (cost to build), and a "combat value" (value
in
> combat).  All other ships have just one value.

> To me IMHO, this seemed kind of silly.

> I always thought that ships should only have one value to purchase it.
> As to combat values, let the systems on board each ship speak for
> themselves...

I take it, then, that you are a proponent of the competetive point
system?

Anyway, this is not quite the same thing. Ligthning Strike recognizes
that
some ships are more valuable in a campaign environment than in
one-offs. This has nothing to do with any economic cost to build. An
extreme example would be an unarmed fleet supply freighter -- totally
dead
weight in a one-off, but worth its weight in gold in a campaign.

-- 
maxxon@swob.dna.fi (Mikko Kurki-Suonio) 	  | A pig who doesn't
fly
GSM +358 50 5596411 Tel +358 9 8092681		  | is just an ordinary
pig
Länsimetsä 3B1 02300 ESPOO FINLAND   Hate me? Try |	      - Porco
Rosso
http://www.swob.dna.fi/~maxxon/      hateme.html  |

Prev: Re: [FT]: Happiness Is.... Next: Re: [OT] Suggested Sci-Fi [CLEAN STAMP]