Re: MT missiles

At 10:03 AM 5/16/00 -0400, Indy wrote:
>Aaron Teske wrote:
>> At 09:28 AM 5/15/00 -0400, Indy wrote:
>> >Aaron Teske wrote:
>> [Floating tables at GZG-ECC III]
>> >> Indy is obviously forgetting the glorious NSL victory over the FSE
where
>> >> the dogs' supercarrier tried to run away, but was chased down and
>> >> destroyed.
>> >
>> >Did we use an extra table for that? I thought things were just
>> >floated as 'normal'.
>> 
>> What, you don't remember grabbing a spare table from the cluster next
to
>> ours, throwing a mat on it, and shifting it around as needed?
>
>Oh yeah, that's right. My mind is fuzzy with about fifteen million
>other things right now.  :-/  Some neural pathways have been
disconnected
>from the main 'net' due to overusage problems.

Excuses, excuses. ^_-

>> >> Unfortunately, some of the FSE escorts managed to get away and
>> >> provide thier lackeys in the UN with faked footage showing the FSE
escorts
>> >> as UN escorts, resulting in the good officers of the NSL squadron
being
>> >> improperly taken to trial for their actions....
>> >>
>> >> <grin>
>> >
>> >The UN was not happy about losing some of their ships.  ;-)
>> 
>> But those were FSE escorts, darn it!  It wasn't our fault if our IFFs
were
>> screwy!
>
>The ESU sent independent observers and salvage operators into the
battle
>area shortly after the unfortunate incident occured. 

Oh, like I trust the *ESU*!!!  Yeah, right.... <snort>

>Their findings
>concluded that the ships involved were indeed NSL and UN. Holovid
footage
>taken from the wreckage of the UN heavy destroyer "Miserindino" showed
>the NSL fleet dramatically blowing apart the *crippled* UN heavy
cruiser
>'Ingraham".

Did the ship surrender?  Did it even *try* to surrender?  I don't think
so.

(Okay, so maybe it didn't get the chance, but still.... ^_- )

>You NSLers didn't clean up the field as well as you thought you had...

How the heck would you clean up anything like that, anyway?

					Aaron