Re: A big problem for the next 100 years - energy demands
From: "Brian Bilderback" <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 11:42:53 PDT
Subject: Re: A big problem for the next 100 years - energy demands
>From: "Thomas.Barclay" <Thomas.Barclay@cbu.xwavesolutions.com>
>Reply-To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
>To: "'GZG-L'" <gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>
>Subject: A big problem for the next 100 years - energy demands
>Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 14:12:45 -0400
>This is a pull, but the gov't would also be pushing people to do
>this. And there would be a reason for trade - to help support the
>homeworld's needs for more energy. The homeworld would offer cheap
labour
>and plentiful technological base in return for resources to help keep
the
>machinery of society running - energy resources.
Thomas,
I agreed with everything you said, but I'd like to clarify something:
In regards to the use of the terms "Push" and "Pull" as I proposed them,
you
have the order turned around. The desire of the colonists to escape the
environmental ravages of Earth would be the "Push," a push away from
Earth
and to the new planet. The desire of the home government to attain a
new
source of energy resources would be the "Pull," a Pull to a place that
has
those things.
However, despite my little nitpicking, You are correct in the idea that
there will be both an attraction for the people to go there, and an
attraction for Earth to send them. Furthermore, I would, and have,
argued,
it requires BOTH elements to provide sufficient impetus for early space
colonization.
Brian Bilderback
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com