Re: GMS/P vs. IAVR
From: "Oerjan Ohlson" <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 17:55:49 +0200
Subject: Re: GMS/P vs. IAVR
Steve Pugh wrote:
>Page 37
>Individual Fire of Support Weapons
>Para 2 "The RANGE BAND is the same as for small arms fire if the
>support weapon is being used by infantry, but can be higher
>(depending on target size) if the weapon is on a groundmount or
>vehicle"
>
>This clearly implies that support weapons can use the 12" x target
>size range bands
>
>Para 3 "Support weapons that are marked with an ASTERIX on the
>weapons table may be fire like HEAVY WEAPONS when firing at point
>targets"
Ah, good!
>Note that it says 'fire like' not just 'resolve damage like' as
>you implied, (so do, for example, IAVRs role Quality + Firepower or
>Quality + Fire Control?).
IAVRs have a section of their very own (p.40), which says that they
roll Quality + Firepower - but note that their anti-vehicle firepower
is given as D8 in this section, while their anti-infantry firepower in
the table on p.36 is D10...
>Heavy Weapon Range Bands
>Para 3 "Note that any MAN-CARRIED and manually-fired weapons >such as
Small Arms and Infantry Support Weapons simply use their >basic Range
Bands against ANY size target; the multiplication of >Range Bands
described above is ONLY used for Heavy Weapons fitted >to vehicles or
groundmounts"
>
> This is the rule you referred to yesterday, with the emphasised ONLY.
>However, it not only contradicts a preceeding passage on the same
>page but also emphasises MAN-CARRIED. So what about infantry >support
weapons which aren't man-carried?
>So you see the confusion?
Not only that - I was quite confused myself :-/
Later,
Oerjan Ohlson
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com
"Life is like a sewer.
What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
- Hen3ry