Re: Active vs Passive
From: Popeyesays@a...
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 15:44:02 EDT
Subject: Re: Active vs Passive
In a message dated 4/13/00 2:34:33 PM Central Daylight Time,
baqrt@mta.ca
writes:
<<
I can agree with this, but with one caveat. Given only a slight
advance
over present-day technology, the detection range will be VASTLY greater
than the weapons range (even for a non-thrusting ship), therefore
you'll
probably have an excellent position/velocity track LONG before you get
within weapons range (of course, weapons range with projectiles against
ballistic targets is essentially infinite, but if you start manuvering
to avoid being hit you've just announced your presence to anyone else
within about 50 AU).
>>
absolutely - lying doggoe with life support and sensors on auxilliary
and
waste heat confined as much as you can stand to the inside of the ship
would
probably make a picket ship a hell! Much like a U Boat running silent in
thickened air and sweltering heat from the bodies within.