Prev: Re: MT missiles and point costs Next: RE: Infantry Walkers for Stargrunt - from Heavy Gear figs...

Re: MT missiles

From: "Oerjan Ohlson" <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 21:26:22 +0200
Subject: Re: MT missiles

Bell, Brian K wrote:

>Then how do you justify going from 16.7% (1 in 6) chance of being shot
>down in MT to 50% (3 in 6) chance in FB? How do you reconcile the
>two?

In the same way, and for the same reason, as the mass value of the FT2
A battery (ie, Mass 3 regardless of the number of fire arcs) is
"reconciled" with the mass value of the FB1 Class-3 battery (Mass 4, +1
per extra arc).

In other words, the FB1 PDS and ADFC rules *replace* the PDAF and ADAF
rules in FT2 and MT, including the references to PDAF and ADAF on page
3 in MT.

Regards,

Oerjan Ohlson
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com

"Life is like a sewer.
  What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
- Hen3ry

Prev: Re: MT missiles and point costs Next: RE: Infantry Walkers for Stargrunt - from Heavy Gear figs...