Re: FB Ship Construction
From: Roger Books <books@m...>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 08:19:21 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: FB Ship Construction
On 22-Nov-99 at 21:46, RWHofrich@aol.com (RWHofrich@aol.com) wrote:
>
> It depends upon your tactics--if you use your DD's to snipe with (at
long
> range) you don't actually need to mount them with the same arcs as you
> would with beam-2's. It's still not that great a trade, as you get
two
> beam-2's in the same space as a 1-arc beam-3--but the plinking
destroyer is
> a bit more survivable than a close-in fighter. Of course, the 3-arc
beam-2
> is a lot more forgiving (assuming you don't guess the enemy's course
very
> well). It all just depends upon your style of play (and that of your
usual
> opponents).
>
I think it depends more on your assigned role for your DD's. If you
want a DD playing around in your battle line give them threes. If your
DD's purpose in life is to defend shipping and convoy raiding then
drop the 3's.
On that note, I think all these house rules about "must have X DD's
for every ship of type X" are bogus. I really can't see any reason
to send those small ships into a major engagement so they can blow
up. A house rule saying no more then 1/3 (or 1/X) of your points
may be in one ship would be fine.
Roger