Re: Attack vs. MultiRole
From: Los <los@c...>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 09:42:45 -0700
Subject: Re: Attack vs. MultiRole
"Imre A. Szabo" wrote:
>
> The US Army had some problems with this when they introduced the M2
and M3
> Bradely's. In the early training exercises the "more survivable"
M2/3's died
> faster and more often then the M113's they replaced. Why? Because
the crews
> were picking fights with MBT's... I'm not sure how or if the US Army
resolved
> this situation.
By training and sticking to the proper doctrine developed to employ the
Bradley in
combat.
Los
(Hopefully we won't open the APC/IFV debates again)