Prev: Re: Roughnecks Next: Re: [FT] Vector vs. cinematic; air vs. naval

Re: [FT] Vector vs. cinematic; air vs. naval

From: "Chip Dunning" <edunning@s...>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 12:15:09 -0400
Subject: Re: [FT] Vector vs. cinematic; air vs. naval

> >I figure I am just
> >missing the rules somewhere. Therefore I will tackle what I see to be
the
> >big problem - beam batteries. I believe that there needs to be system
of
> >anti-beam defense.
>
> Ummm...there are: screens (level-1 and level-2). These reduce the
effectiveness
> of beams fairly well.

Yes, but there exists no way for escort vessels to provide some measure
of
beam defense for their charges.

Chip
-----
Programming: It's not just a job - it's an indenture

Prev: Re: Roughnecks Next: Re: [FT] Vector vs. cinematic; air vs. naval