Re: FB small carrier construction

Roger Books wrote:

> Let's see.
>
> We wanted to encourage smaller ships, otherwise each side would
> have a few big ships.  We still wanted big ships possible though,
> so we set the biggest ship (the FSE supercarrier) to cost around
> 100 to maintain, 100 being our chosen output for an average world
> on a turn.
>
> One of my gaming group was big on the **1.6 (golden ratio I believe),
> and the 0.06 kind of fell out from there.
>
> If anyone is interested I could post our current campaign rules
> and people could pick them apart.  We have added things like a
> flag bridge and admirals (an admiral may command a fleet with a
> certain mass, we do not use fleet morale UNLESS there is no admiral
> or the fleet is too big).
>
> I should point out something about our game, mostly we play at
> work over lunch, so things were written into our campaign system
> to attempt to limit the size of battles.  You could easily tweak
> a few numbers and have much larger games.
>
> Roger Books

I am interested.  (I am allways interested in campain rules...:-)

Donald Hosford