Prev: Re: rivet modeling technique was: Re: [OT] Ironclads and Tanks and Such Next: Re: Heavy Fighters

Re: [FT] Fighter question I'm confused

From: "Oerjan Ohlson" <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 19:58:42 +0200
Subject: Re: [FT] Fighter question I'm confused

jeremy claridge wrote:

> > The interceptor/attack fighter re-rolls should get the +1 for
damage
> > purposes, but you need to roll a "6" on the unmodified die to get
the
> > re-roll in the first place. Or, if you like, rolls of "6" on the
> > *modified* die gives you a re-roll, but rolls of "5" or "7" do not
-
> > the effect is the same <g>
> 
> Ok let me see if I understand this attack fighter thing:
> 
> A roll of 6 does 2 damage and allows for a re-roll (the +1 is wasted)
> A roll of 5 also does 2 damage (i.e. 5 +1 for attack bonus) but no
re-roll
> 
> And then you are still applying the +1 bonus to any subsequent
re-rolls?

Got it in one!

Just don't run into any standard fighters (or, worse still,
Interceptors <shudder>)...

Oerjan Ohlson
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com

"Life is like a sewer.
  What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
- Hen3ry

Prev: Re: rivet modeling technique was: Re: [OT] Ironclads and Tanks and Such Next: Re: Heavy Fighters