Re: Mini-GZG-ECC 2.5

Tim Jones wrote:
> 
> >	http://scivax.stsci.edu/~kochte/s11.html
> >
>  The usual high quality AAR, plus this is a good quick game scenario
> with lots of tactical depth. One for the bookmarks.
> 
> -= tim jones =-

I agree.  A very nice writeup and scenario design.  There is a minor 
difference with the game we played Monday and the current scenario and
that is the elevated victory conditions for the destruction of the NAC
Light Carrier.	With this change, there would have been a slight change
in tactics for both sides.

The FSE would have concentrated the salvos on the CVL and ignore the 
NSL ships for the first pass, and the NAC probably would have held back 
one or two squadrons of fighters for missile defense.  ADFC were 
sorely lacking in both FSE and ESU squadrons.

Jon