Prev: [FT] A thought on that vector movement problem Next: Re: 18.1" Anti-Aircraft Guns!!!

Re: [FT] Playtest of Fulton's MT Missile rules proposal

From: -MWS- <Hauptman@c...>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 17:57:23 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [FT] Playtest of Fulton's MT Missile rules proposal

On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Sean Bayan Schoonmaker wrote:
[snip]
> This is a problem. You can't assume that all the SMRs are going to hit
> before PDS fire. Where-as you can almost be sure that all your
missiles
> will. (See Olerjan's previous post concerning hitting with the
proposed
> system)
> 
> SMR fire is spread out to catch a ship in a net. On average, maybe
half
> will hit. The MT missiles are "pinpoint" weapons.

You need to finish reading the rest of the post <g>, since you'll see
that I
came to the same conclusion and suggested that the secondary movement be
eliminated from the proposal.

===================================================================
Mark "Hauptmann" Shurtleff
  email: hauptman@sfcmd.com -or- hauptman@concentric.net
       The Gear Locker:  http://www.sfcmd.com/HeavyGear/
	   Full Thrust:  http://www.sfcmd.com/fullthrust/

 Finagle's Law:
   The perversity of the Universe tends towards the maximum.
===================================================================

Prev: [FT] A thought on that vector movement problem Next: Re: 18.1" Anti-Aircraft Guns!!!