Prev: Re: OT: You guys aren't going to believe this.... Next: Re: [FTFB] Not ships, exactally. . .

Britannia, was Re: In defence of Monarchy

From: "Oerjan Ohlson" <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 16:45:21 +0100
Subject: Britannia, was Re: In defence of Monarchy

Niall Gilsenan wrote:

> I thought that sounded more correct.	Then again most of what I know 
> about the Angles history is drawn from that venerable old boardgame 
> "Brittania". Blue team if I remember rightly.  I think I'm displaying
all the 
> signs of a misspent youth...

"Britannia" has the general eras reasonably correct, so for a general
overview it isn't bad. 

'Course, it could be the cause of Thomas's confusion since the Belgae
(Celtic tribes living in south-east England when the Romans invaded) and
the Angles both belong to the Blue "team" <g>

Regards,

Oerjan Ohlson
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com

"Life is like a sewer.
  What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
- Hen3ry

Prev: Re: OT: You guys aren't going to believe this.... Next: Re: [FTFB] Not ships, exactally. . .