Prev: Re: Rules for BFG/FT Conversion. Next: Re: Life around an M-class star

Re: Planetery Defense Batteries

From: John Leary <john_t_leary@p...>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 16:16:00 -0800
Subject: Re: Planetery Defense Batteries

Michael Blair wrote:
...Snip...JTL
> I like 180 degrees (3 arc), horizon to horizon, but a friend has
> suggested 270 degrees (I don;t understand how or why) or even 360
> degrees.
...Snip...JTL
> What do you think?
> 
> Michael.

Micheal,
     I am rather against the concept of having 'beams' on planets.
An orbital battle station/s is better for the 'space' aspect of 
FT.   Another reason, perhaps more valid in game justification
terms, would be: Ortillery has no reason to exist if the beams
can reach the ground.  

Bye for now,
John L.


Prev: Re: Rules for BFG/FT Conversion. Next: Re: Life around an M-class star