Prev: Re: [DS] camo schemes for vehicles Next: Re: [FT][SG][DS] Canada, the US Civil War II, and the structure

RE: Just Saw ST:Insurrection- No Spoilers..

From: Mike Wikan <MWikan@m...>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 16:04:37 -0800
Subject: RE: Just Saw ST:Insurrection- No Spoilers..

I always took those close range firefights as being the Socialist Star
Fleet's notion of making it a "Fair fight" against lower tech
opponents....

Heh..

Michael Wikan
Game Design
Slave Zero
Accolade, Inc.
http://www.slavezero.com
mwikan@accolade.com
wikan@sprintmail.com
"We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night
to
visit violence on those who would do us harm."-George Orwell

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Looney IONet [SMTP:mlooney@ionet.net]
> Sent: Friday, December 11, 1998 3:45 PM
> To:	gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> Subject:	Re: Just Saw ST:Insurrection- No Spoilers..
> 
> > Mike Wikan wrote:
> > 
> > Not Half bad. Standard Fare. Couple minor spaceship fights, good CG.
> > 
> > 
> But we are talking star ship fights with ranges of less than 400
meters
> and USS-1701-E being flow like a fighter.
> 
> The ground ponder parts would make a good SG-II game, I think.
> 
> My name for it is "The Magnificent Seven In Space"....


Prev: Re: [DS] camo schemes for vehicles Next: Re: [FT][SG][DS] Canada, the US Civil War II, and the structure