RE: [FT][SG][DS] Canada, the US Civil War II, and the structure of the NAC (really long)
From: "George,Eugene M" <Eugene.M.George@k...>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 13:13:59 -0800
Subject: RE: [FT][SG][DS] Canada, the US Civil War II, and the structure of the NAC (really long)
There ain't nothing in the US East of the Rockies worth mentioning!
Viva los California y Tejas Libre!
Feeling funny after a big lunch....
Gene
> ----------
> From: John M. Atkinson[SMTP:john.m.atkinson@erols.com]
> Reply To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> Sent: Friday, December 11, 1998 2:57 PM
> To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> Subject: Re: [FT][SG][DS] Canada, the US Civil War II, and the
> structure of the NAC (really long)
>
> Adrian Johnson wrote:
>
> > and geographical factors. The old State organization of the US is
> > disolved, with several exceptions: The new areas include New
England,
> The
> > Great Lakes Region, The Carolinas, Florida, Texas, California, the
South
> > West, the Rocky Mountain States, and the Great Central Plains. Each
> area
>
> You're missing great hunks of the US. Virginia, WVa, Maryland,
> Kentucky, etc, etc, etc.
>
> You also have to incorporate all of South and Central America. This
> isn't just one big happy Anglo family with marginal numbers of
> Hispanics. They probably outnumber non-Hispanic Whites. Brazil alone
> today has 155,822,400 inhabitants, more than twice the population of
the
> UK, and they all speak Portugese!
>
> John M. Atkinson
>