RE: [FT] Keeping "Old" RGs

I posted the chart for this version a couple of weeks back, but I'll
have to recalculate for adding the RG class to the re-roll.

'Neath Southern Skies
http://users.mcmedia.com.au/~denian/
*****
T'was brillig, & the slithy toves,
Did gyre & gimle in the wabe.
All mimsy were the borogroves,
And mome raths outgrabe.
		       - Lewis Carroll "Through the Looking Glass".

-----Original Message-----
From:	Sean Bayan Schoonmaker [SMTP:schoon@aimnet.com]
Sent:	Saturday, December 05, 1998 2:31 PM
To:	gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Subject:	[FT] Keeping "Old" RGs

OK, here's an idea.

Keep RGs the same in function as the old system except for a slight
modification to the damage system.

For the damage roll, 1-4 damage = class, 5-6 damage = 2 x class.
Add 1 per RG class; subtract 1 per armour level.

Simple. Gives heavier RGs an advantage. Easy armour rule.

I don't have the time right mow to work out potential mass and cost, but
I'm sure someone will.

Schoon