Prev: RE: KV Railguns vs Armour (NSS system) Pt1/2 Next: RE: KV Railguns vs armour pt 2/2 (full ship conversion to FTFB)

Re: [FT] Size of "Countries" in FT

From: Tony Wilkinson <twilko@o...>
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 1998 22:52:02 +0000
Subject: Re: [FT] Size of "Countries" in FT

At 20:39 05/12/98 +1000, you wrote:
>But we have uncontested claims over 2/3 of Antarctica, which pushes us
>way over Canada in size. Not that we actually try to enforce them - the
>Antarctic Treaty forbids that. But should any idiot try to abrogate
>this, then we get the lion's share. Unless anyone objects militarily...
>
	Fighting on Antartica does not look like fun. Heavy casulaties
just from
the place let alone fighting. Does Beth have anything to say here.

	Tony.
	twilko@ozemail.com.au

>-- 
>aebrain@dynamite.com.au     <> <>    How doth the little Crocodile
>| Alan & Carmel Brain|      xxxxx	 Improve his shining tail?
>| Canberra Australia |  xxxxxHxHxxxxxx _MMMMMMMMM_MMMMMMMMM
> abrain@cs.adfa.oz.au	o OO*O^^^^O*OO o oo	oo oo	  oo  
>		     By pulling MAERKLIN Wagons, in 1/220 Scale
>
>
>
>

Prev: RE: KV Railguns vs Armour (NSS system) Pt1/2 Next: RE: KV Railguns vs armour pt 2/2 (full ship conversion to FTFB)