Re: DSII SGII Thoughts on SLAMs for SGII
From: "Andrew & Alex" <Al.Bri@x...>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 10:53:13 +1300
Subject: Re: DSII SGII Thoughts on SLAMs for SGII
Thomas Barclay <Thomas.Barclay@sofkin.ca> wrote:
>Impact is as artillery (GPE, Anti-Armour, Anti-Personnel depending
>on weapons load out).
Now that's an interesting idea for putting back into DSII! AP or AT
or
GP loads for SLaM missiles. My initial thoughts are that the standard
SLaM
are GP rounds. A AP variant would draw an extra chit for infantry
targets
and soft skinned vehicles and would have no effect versus armoured
targets.
The AT variant would draw an extra chit for armoured targets, and be
ineffective versus infantry and soft-skinned vehicles.
Any thoughts, comments?
Andrew Martin
-------------
Shared email: Al.Bri@xtra.co.nz
Web Site: http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/
Blind See-Saw Site: http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/SEE-SAW/
Dirtside II Site: http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/DSII/
Dirtside II FAQ: http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/DSII/FAQ/
GZG E-Mail FAQ:
http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/DSII/FAQ/Ettiquette.html
FUDGE GM Site: http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/FUDGE/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
----------------------------------------------------------------------