Prev: Re: Planet Assault Next: Re: Splitting the Mailing List

Re: still FMA-40k

From: Magnus Alexandersson <m96maal@m...>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 15:14:07 +0200 (MET DST)
Subject: Re: still FMA-40k

On Sun, 27 Sep 1998, Oerjan Ohlson wrote:

> Magnus Alexandersson skrev:
> 
> > Well, my thoughs were that you would give them a bonus in the
reaktion 
> > test, 
> 
> Should you get a reaction test bonus just because you have a sword? I
> don't think so (I know for sure that *I* personally don't get one -
not
> against ranged weapons, anyway <g>). I'd rather just make assault
troops
> like Banshees etc (if you use GW models) high-quality units overall;
that
> both gives them a good chance in the reaction tests and makes them
very
> hard in CC (coupled with their CC weapons, of course).
> 

What I meant was that a specialist squad like the Assaultsquads, Aspect 
CC versions would have a bonus to the reaction test, not b/ of armament 
but 'cuz they KNOW they will win IF they get into CC with the enemy. 
That's why they should have that bonus.
 
Picture Magnus standing, wielding a sword (wooden, not strong enough)
and 
a solid tin can with a portable flamethrower in one hand and a Chainsaw
in 
the other bouncing in 40 meter strides thanks to the blow torch strapped

to his back...

Another question... Jumppacks, are there any rules for them?

> 
> In order to inflict serious casualties on the enemy, you have to call
in
> artillery support - or send in a close assault. Getting artillery
support
> can take a lot of time and isn't able to handle all situations anyway,
so
> the close assault gets important.
> 
Then why not special CC troops, that can hit a position hard and
"cleanse 
and burn" alittle ;P

///magnus

*********************************************
|	    Magnus Alexandersson	    |
|Email: m96maal@mtek.chalmers.se	    |
|Site: http://www.mtek.chalmers.se/~m96maal |
*********************************************

Prev: Re: Planet Assault Next: Re: Splitting the Mailing List