Re: still FMA-40k
From: Magnus Alexandersson <m96maal@m...>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 15:14:07 +0200 (MET DST)
Subject: Re: still FMA-40k
On Sun, 27 Sep 1998, Oerjan Ohlson wrote:
> Magnus Alexandersson skrev:
>
> > Well, my thoughs were that you would give them a bonus in the
reaktion
> > test,
>
> Should you get a reaction test bonus just because you have a sword? I
> don't think so (I know for sure that *I* personally don't get one -
not
> against ranged weapons, anyway <g>). I'd rather just make assault
troops
> like Banshees etc (if you use GW models) high-quality units overall;
that
> both gives them a good chance in the reaction tests and makes them
very
> hard in CC (coupled with their CC weapons, of course).
>
What I meant was that a specialist squad like the Assaultsquads, Aspect
CC versions would have a bonus to the reaction test, not b/ of armament
but 'cuz they KNOW they will win IF they get into CC with the enemy.
That's why they should have that bonus.
Picture Magnus standing, wielding a sword (wooden, not strong enough)
and
a solid tin can with a portable flamethrower in one hand and a Chainsaw
in
the other bouncing in 40 meter strides thanks to the blow torch strapped
to his back...
Another question... Jumppacks, are there any rules for them?
>
> In order to inflict serious casualties on the enemy, you have to call
in
> artillery support - or send in a close assault. Getting artillery
support
> can take a lot of time and isn't able to handle all situations anyway,
so
> the close assault gets important.
>
Then why not special CC troops, that can hit a position hard and
"cleanse
and burn" alittle ;P
///magnus
*********************************************
| Magnus Alexandersson |
|Email: m96maal@mtek.chalmers.se |
|Site: http://www.mtek.chalmers.se/~m96maal |
*********************************************