RE: GZG FH: Blue water navy.

Tom Anderson wrote:

>noah wrote:

>> Wet-navy ships would probably work best with an FT-ish > system -
note 
the
>> plethora of 'Wet Thrust' type adaptations.

>there are at least two 'full steam's done or in the works, and i have
seen 
a 'deep strike' or something, with subs. i think the name 'wet >thrust'
has 
been avoided for fear of getting the censors involved ...

>>  For post-modern naval combat,

>postmodern naval combat? "ok, my battleship fires a missile salvo",
"ah, 
but your battleship is just a semiotic textualisation of >recurrent 
precapitalist social pragma ..."

At this point, the missile salvo impacts...with gratifying results.

Noah :)