Prev: Re: Star Soldier (Near space maps) Next: Power Armour thoughts

Re: FTFB- After Action Report/Newbie questions (longish :-) )

From: Jon Davis <davis@a...>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 20:38:02 -0400
Subject: Re: FTFB- After Action Report/Newbie questions (longish :-) )



Derek Smyk wrote:

> >I'm a fan of the super carrier as well, but I waffle between a
> >fragile hull with lots of fighters and a thrust 2 carrier with
> >over 50% of its mass in hull and armor.  When using boosters on
> >one's fighters, (using combat endurance to get the extra 12"
> >movement), it is often necessary to refuel one's fighters.  A
> >heavily armored carrier is more likely to survive to retrieve
> >fighters.
>
> This leads to something I've wondered about for a while - how long
does
> it take to refuel fighters?  Has there ever been a consensus reached?

It's up to a house rule to provide this answer, and the answers are
many.

Ideally, this is an issue that needs to be clarified in the FT3 rule
book.

Jon

Prev: Re: Star Soldier (Near space maps) Next: Power Armour thoughts