Prev: Re: Canadian Convention Next: RE: Canadian Convention

RE: What about the UN? - Longish

From: "BEST, David" <dbest@s...>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 12:19:58 -0600
Subject: RE: What about the UN? - Longish

Sort of sounds like The Fleet from U.N.C.L.E.

David Best
Section II Operations and Enforcement

----------
From:  Thomas Barclay [SMTP:Thomas.Barclay@sofkin.ca]
Sent:  Monday, July 27, 1998 2:56 PM
To:  FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk
Subject:  Re: What about the UN? - Longish

Niall spake thusly upon matters weighty: 
> Well if they did have a covert ops division things would probably work
out
> better for them.  Since invariably it does not work out it stands to
reason
> that they don't have one (hows that for a display of spurious logic).
> Flying about in black helicopters would be a fairly silly thing to do
if
> you wanted to remain a "covert" operation in any case.  Just paint the
damn
> things with a local paint job (us, isreali, whatever) and you're much
> better hidden.

Hmm. Or how about the fact the UN has achieved what it needs - Core 
system stability. Perhaps they do covert ops after all. We haven't 
wiped ourselves out yet.... we can at least leave that to the Bugs. 
 
> 


Prev: Re: Canadian Convention Next: RE: Canadian Convention