Re: Odd FT Idea
From: jatkins6@i... (John Atkinson)
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 1998 22:44:38 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: Odd FT Idea
You wrote:
>BTW, I checked some numbers on the CIA's World Factbook 1997
>much in 200 years. I think the RCC will hold some degree of power in
the FSE,
Remember though, those numbers indicate "official" Catholics. i.e.,
those baptised as infants in RCC. Whether or not they've darkened the
doors since then is rather problematical. In many European nations you
are sorta assumed to be a certain religion unless you make an issue out
of being otherwise. When my parents lived in Germany during the late
1970s (for those of you counting, yes, I was born there) German
citizens paid a tithe as part of their annual taxes. You checked
either Catholic or Evangaelisch (analogous to US's Lutherans, pardon my
spelling). You could nominate another church with some amount of
governmental paperwork. But many Germans are Catholic or Lutheran once
a year--when they check their little box on the tax form, and have
nothing to do with God or religion the rest of the time. Even in US
without governmental pressure one way or another, all churches have
more bodies on rolls than actually present. Last I heard, my church
has about 700 paper members. Sunday attendance is about 500 or so.
And we have an agressive program of weeding people off the rolls if
they never show up and we can't contact them (Hello, if you moved to
Alaska it's common courtesy to let organizations you are a member of
know to drop you off the rolls). I understand it's common for
attendance in some churches to be a third or less of the paper rolls.
>all over the map. With the various trends occuring, I make no (or
few) >predictions there.
In US at least religion is very cyclical. Holiness
Movements/Awakenings/whatever at the drop of a hat, religions that are
here today and gone tomorrow, prediction is impossible.
John M. Atkinson